There are PROPHETS In the FATHERLAND! (С) V.S.Petruhin
15.04.2012, 09:51
ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF THE LEFT MOVEMENT AND NECESSITY OF SOME DIRECTIONS OF THE FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF THE THEORY OF MARX /reflections marksoveda/
Two problems of the left movement are allocated as one of the main things: I.отсутствие The modern theory of radical transformation of a society And II. Absence of unity of the left forces.
Research,
knowledge, understanding existing should precede any practical
activities, no moral indignation of the existing will result in its
productive progressive transformation. In due time Spinosa whom Marx so
highly appreciated and deeply respected, an Called: «not to cry, not to
laugh, and to understand» (or otherwise, on Latin: «indignari, non
admirari, sed intelligere). In the spring of 1845, more one and a half
centuries ago Marx has formulated one of the major theoretical
positions:« Philosophers explained in only various image the world, but
business consists in changing it ». Original sense of this thesis:
Philosophers only"explained"the world to reconcile with existing, it is
necessary to learn existing to change it. To learn, to change - such is
deep sense of this ingenious idea. And later similar thought at LENIN:
Without the revolutionary theory cannot be and revolutionary movement. And
today the left movement integrally connected with the theory of Marx,
can change nothing in our society (neither in the country, nor in the
world), not having investigated existing and not having understood it. One
of fundamental features of the theory of Marx - its historicism. IT is
caused by that its deep kernel - materialistic dialectics, the general
theory of development. Development is integral essence of the theory of
Marx. Therefore in work of 1972 possibility to formulate it so was
presented to me: Development is a way of existence of Marxism («future
Contours», с.8). Without development the Marxism ceases to be the
actual theory and turns simply to a museum piece. From here - a
historicism of the theory of MARX. A historicism in three senses: it is a
product of a certain historical epoch; throughout a life and Marx's
activity and Engels their theory essentially developed; so without its
further development in ours essentially its other new epoch it is
impossible mechanically, without the further creative development to
apply as the guide to action. Throughout the past of 40 years in process
of forces and possibilities it was possible to do attempts to develop
those or other elements of the theory of Marx in the spirit of its
founders. Now there is a possibility to offer already number of concrete
directions of its further development in two plans is and components of
this universal theory, and necessity of the further research of
concrete problems. 1. First of all, working out of a new scientific
direction or even a new science - the general theory of practice is
necessary. It integrally follows from dialektiko - materialistic
understanding of the basic question of philosophy, a question on a life
and consciousness parity. Practice it not that other as return influence
of consciousness on life. The understanding of logic structure and
algorithm of its elements, and as basic laws from this follows. Today it
is already possible to formulate two ten elements of the general theory
of practice. All it was offered for the first time last year ….
February 2009г., on Marksovsky readings at Institute of philosophy of
the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2. It is known, that the
materialistic dialectics is the deep kernel, a fundamental basis of the
theory of Marx which he was going to develop in the form of special
product: «when I will dump economic burden (i.e. I will finish work
on"Capital"), I will write"Dialectics", - he spoke (see my chapter about
it with VITALY Bygodskim« Charles Marx's Economic heritage », M.
1956г.). - In development of this major component of the Marxist theory
the special course -« Dialectics as methodology is prepared. Practical
methodology of a heritage of Marx and Engels. 100 elements of dialectics
- 100т practical recommendations ». This cycle is calculated at 40
o'clock. 3. It is known, that Engels repeatedly spoke and wrote about
Marx's two great opening thanks to which the socialism has turned from a
Utopia to a science. This materialistic understanding of history, is
more exact dialektiko-materialistic understanding of a society and its
history, and as the theory of a surplus value based on the labour theory
of cost of Smith and Риккардо and forming a kernel of Marxist political
economy. More the general theory of cost the author tried to prove the
critical analysis of the labour theory of cost and necessity of working
out in the performances and publications. But within the limits of the
general logic structure of the theory of Marx working out and other
scientific direction investigating and other party of the relation of
the person to the nature - an ecological problematics is necessary. 4.
A number of problems demands modern research in the field of
materialistic understanding of history. Engels considered, that after
creation … надцатой concepts «should be studied all history anew». At
first sight it can be understood so, that on the basis of new
understanding of history it is possible to understand concrete
historical events more deeply. But objectively also deeper idea here
contains: history audit should lead to deeper understanding of most this
new concept. Not to be unfounded, here a number of actual historical
problems which demand new profound and actual research: The general theory of social revolutions; The general theory формационного society transformation, i.e. transition from one public formation to the new; The
transition period theory (not as period of dictatorship of proletariat,
and in a broad sense as period from existing public relations to a
society in which free development of everyone will be a condition of
free development of everything, that is free development of one will not
limit free development of others); Than there was actually «a real socialism»; The reasons of its crash; in what specificity (differencia spezifica) the left movement, its possible real program. Perhaps
it is a priority of the general interests unlike procapitalist right,
from a priority of the private interests, the hypertrophied rights of
individuals? The new, actual Marxist futurology, in two aspects is
necessary also: Methodology of a scientific prediction of the future
(on this aspect specificity of such methodology in Marx's works and
Engels has been investigated; the result can be formulated) and sights
of founders of Marxism about the future, classless society and (on the
given aspect the huge material in the form of a huge superheading about
communistic transformation of a society and about the most future
society in the big index to 50 volumes of the Russian edition of
Compositions of Marx and Engels is collected; Are thus revealed and
analysed more than 600 aspects of the future which founders of Marxism
expressly or by implication expressed). There is extremely actual
problem: the contradiction between productive forces and relations of
production as the deep reason of a social revolution and where that
objective force of a modern society which is capable to carry out
similar transformation. All it demands research and discussion. In
communication by a role of the left movements in the modern world
(Социнтерн, socialists, sotsial - democrats, labourites, etc.) it is
necessary to pay special attention on a problem: Marxism and a
revisionism. And in connection with rough achievements of natural
sciences and value of interdisciplinary directions of development of
scientific knowledge on philosophical aspects of this area. What in present conditions can do the left movement? Shortly
speaking: to create preconditions and to promote creation of
preconditions of communistic transformation of a society or, more
cautiously speaking, preconditions for transition to a new
post-capitalist public formation. We summarise: So: 1. Working
out of the modern theory of necessary transformation of a society,
leaning against understanding of the new historical phenomena, all
achievements of the scientific knowledge, the saved up experience of
transformation of public relations and experience of the left movements. 2. Distribution of new ideas to weights for the purpose of their transformation into material force. 3.
Creation of all матнериальных (first of all economic), political,
organizational, spiritual and theoretical preconditions of a new public
formation. 4. On a threshold of a new epoch of economy of knowledge to struggle for the new law on the information. 5.
To struggle for originally democratic political control system of a
society (democracy, instead of охлократия; the greatest possible
elections of all officials; equal access of all political forces and
movements to mass media; the control of voters over actions of deputies;
with that end in view full publicity of their activity: the Internet,
radio, TV, the press; the response right, criminal punishment for use of
"an administrative resource» etc. etc.); public electronic voting on
elections and widely practised referenda. 6. To test new social
procedures. For example, the total and open electronic control over all
incomes and expenses of all citizens. 7. To study possibility - in
connection with enormous growth of productive forces - it is essential
to raise a lath of social requirements: the right of all citizens
(workers) to worthy existence: safety, free habitation, satisfaction of
primary requirements (a food etc.), free public health services,
formation etc.; a payment of women on education of children etc. 8.
Struggle for the progressive legislation: transition from presidential
republic to parliamentary, essential increase of a role of the State
Duma; legislative restriction of stratification of the population;
introduction progressive налогооблажения; elections of all гос.
Officials; wide use of referenda; an interdiction for actual
privatisation of the natural rent. It is necessary to mean, that
founders of Marxism considered democratic republic even as the ready
form for proletariat dictatorship 9. The higher and an ultimate goal -
a most important task of development a post - of a capitalist society
creation of conditions for free development of each member of a society
without restriction of freedom of all its other members should be
humanistic. George Aleksandrovich Bagaturija
THERE ARE PROPHETS IN THE FATHERLAND! (To
G.A.Bagaturija's article «Actual problems of the left movement and
necessity of some directions of the further development of the theory of
Marx»)
Known
in the USSR and in the world, respected in the left movement of modern
Russia the expert on марксоведению and socialist philosophy the Doctor
of Philosophy, the professor G.A.Bagaturija, has acted on September,
30th in Moscow at seminar session «Marxist readings». Declared by heads
of a seminar a theme: «Actual problems of the left movement and a way of
development of Marxism», at the author sounded a little differently
(more correctly): «Actual problems of the left movement and necessity of
some directions of the further development of the theory of Marxism».
So the text of its performance where the accent falls on a word
"necessity" which specifies is entitled, that without it it is
impossible to manage. For today G.A.Bagaturija - the unique expert in
the left movement капээрэфного the type, connected problems of the left
movement with necessity of some directions of the further development
of the theory of Marxism. It is the shouting validity: the left
forces of Russia and the world are separated, because there is no
«modern theory of radical transformation of a society». For this reason
the author has allocated two main problems: 1. Absence of the modern
theory of radical transformation of a society. 2. Absence of unity of
the left forces. According to Багатурия from which we completely
agree that there was such radical theory, creative development of
Marxism is necessary. Without creative development the Marxism ceases to
be actual force. Marx's two great opening, thanks to which the
socialism has turned from a Utopia to a science (the materialistic
understanding of history and the surplus value theory) Багатурия names a
kernel of Marxist political economy. We name their top of Marxist
political economy. Also it is necessary to begin creative development of
Marxism with this top during each new epoch. That is each new step
forward should be accompanied by the analysis of the main economic
concepts (categories), proceeding from the practical validity. In
relations of the property (assignment), in economic relations as a
whole, - the reasons of stagnation and the precondition of new
transformations are covered. «Any practical activities, - writes
Багатурия, - research, knowledge, understanding existing should precede,
no moral indignation of the existing will result in its productive
progressive transformation». So. In our case - research, knowledge,
understanding of the deep reasons of a collapse of the USSR should
precede research, knowledge, understanding of capitalism existing in
today's Russia. To understand the reasons of disorder of the USSR it is
possible, only leaning against a Marxist dialectic method, the
materialistic theory and a historical materialism. To Move ahead it is
possible: Creatively developing the Marxist doctrine; Proceeding
thus from interests of each person of a socialist society as, first,
interests of each person disturb Marxism, and secondly, it conducts to
growth of labour productivity and riches and prosperity of all socialist
society. First of all, it is necessary to understand: what happens
in basis - in an economic system of the USSR? Why and where to
productive forces (people) began to stir the existing relations of
production imposed by the CPSU, owning, using and disposing all
resources of the country, passing the laws, confirming plans etc., and
so forth? Whether there is an answer to these questions? Is. The
stagnation reasons - in accruing indifference of citizens to a state
ownership. The reasons of accruing indifference - in a capitalist way of
a payment. There was a question on activization of "the human factor».
Party and scientists of the Stalin and Poststalin period did not work
over this question properly, that is in necessary, originally socialist
direction. During the critical moment (90) the private-ownership point
of view has prevailed. Wrongly was considered and it is considered, what
exactly capitalism makes active all and all. Whether there were
preconditions of new socialist transformations? Were and is! To change
property relations: to pass from the state form to directly public
pattern of ownership which believes proprietors of all and everyone. For
this purpose it is necessary to change streams have arrived, as it is
shown on schemes 1 and 2, accordingly: «the Soviet state manufacture:
the subject of possession; formation, movement and profit distribution»
and «socially personalised (originally socialist) manufacture: the
subject of possession; formation, movement and profit distribution» (for
viewing of schemes it is necessary to enter on a site and to open the
given material). This problem basically and in detailed calculations
has been solved by then by V.S.Petruhinym, and bosses knew about it. But
for them «несть the prophet in the fatherland». They only considered
themselves as prophets. And they have replaced Marxism сталинизмом and
on the sly removed its (Marxism) aside. The problem has been solved
by V.S.Petruhinym proceeding from the Marxist doctrine and in
development of the Marxist doctrine. As disinterest of people became a
brake of development of manufacture, it was necessary to understand the
main principle of the payment which have been written down in article 12
of the Constitution of the USSR (1936): "from everyone on its ability,
everyone - on its work". The analysis has shown, that proceeding from
the Marxist doctrine, this principle is applied not truly. By this
principle the salary established to capitalist measures was distributed.
Differently, on work the result of the work including profit created by
additional work, and the planned wage fund including, including,
surcharges and awards was distributed not. It was actually distributed
(and it has been established by V.S.Petruhinym) the price of a labour
spread out to shares. And this distribution was given to the discretion
of heads. The USSR went on a way of assignment of the profit,
fulfilled in the capitalist world. But if the capitalist economy
therefore also capitalist, that alienates a surplus value (profit) at
those who makes it, and thus maintains wage labour the socialist economy
cannot alienate profit at those who makes it. Otherwise it remains
capitalist. The ten exploiters has turned to one cumulative capitalist -
the state. Capitalism "cut-away" - alienation of a surplus value
(profit) at those who makes it, at workers, owners of means of
production. Socialism "cut-away" - assignment of a surplus value
(profit) by those who directly makes it, - workers who are
simultaneously proprietors of means of production. To give profit to
those who makes it, it is necessary to know, who makes a surplus value.
That the nobility who makes a surplus value, it is necessary to be able
to count it. And this problem has been solved by V.S.Petruhinym. For the
capitalist such calculations are not necessary. And for the cumulative
capitalist such calculations are not necessary. To take out all made
production on the market where the surplus value laying in the goods
turns to profit enough, and to appropriate this profit. In socialist
manufacture where the earth, factories, factories, other organisations
belong to all and everyone, it is necessary to be able to count a
surplus value as it is created by work of each person. The problem
has been solved in the late eighties (Look articles and books Петрухина:
to Work on profit », magazine" Non-Black Earth Region "№1, 1989;« to
Pay for work », magazine" Non-Black Earth Region "of №6,1988;« Where to
conduct «the Russian locomotive» », magazine« File of the bookkeeper
»№23, 1996;« Personification of assignment of profit - a way to the
higher labour productivity, a solving condition of economic and social
evolution of Russia (from motivation to self-motivation) », the
scientific edition« Evolution of Russia, volume 2, 2010 ";" the Package
of the specifications and technical documentation for working off of new
relations of the property in economy and at the processing enterprises
of Ministry of Agriculture and Food Production of RSFSR », Ministry of
Agriculture and Food Production of RSFSR, 1991;« Thread Ариадны », the
Moscow State University, 1995;« Management ХХ1 of a century », М-1998;«
History and the economy future », М-2009 year.; set of materials in the
newspaper« Economic and philosophical newspaper », and also on the
Internet, including in the co-authorship). Naturally, the surplus
value is a concept and a category of the capitalist world. As the
concept, a surplus value roots not in heads of people, and in the valid
capitalist manufacture. Inherently is corresponding to a capitalist way
of manufacture the cost form of surplus of a product of work over costs
of maintenance of the work alienated at its direct manufacturers. We
use this concept because it is in details worked by Marxism,
intelligibly and consequently that in the world still there is no
socialist way of manufacture. The Soviet union was the cumulative
capitalist, but in consciousness of all world it is identified with
socialism. Therefore today (when the USSR has disappeared), going to
socialism, we leave from this concept, putting socialist essence in
concepts «economic персонализм», «socially personalised system of
manufacture and assignment», «socially personalised (originally
socialist) way of manufacture». The USSR was in a step from it. Russia also can is now easy pass to socialist system of manufacture and assignment. The
surplus value appropriated by its manufacturers as should be in
originally socialist society, naturally, will be understood and called
in another way. But it will be the same surplus of a product of work
over costs of maintenance of work because it is made in any modern
society, and without it progress is impossible. Only the cost form of
this surplus will be appropriated by those who makes it, and, hence, and
will be called differently. V.S.Petruhin suggests to name its
superfluous cost. Today on this basis it is necessary to create
uniform political force, to take the power and to pass to originally
socialist society. In Russia there is «an objective force … which is
capable to carry out similar transformation» are isolated left,
including the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, the
organisations and unorganized industrial Working class of Russia. To unite to us! And the beginning of creation uniting all «the modern theory of radical transformation of a society» - is already necessary. Leaning against the aforesaid, it is possible and it is necessary to create and write (we quote G.A.Bagaturija): «The
general theory of social revolutions; the general theory формационного
society transformation, i.e. transition from one public formation to the
new; the transition period theory (not as period of dictatorship of
proletariat, and in a broad sense as period from existing public
relations to a society in which free development of everyone will be a
condition of free development of everything, that is free development of
one will not limit free development of others); than there was
actually« a real socialism »; the reasons of its crash; in what
specificity (differencia spezifica) the left movement, its possible real
program». 13.10.2011. Members of initiative group «New
Communists» on organising committee creation «Uniform political force of
workers of Russia» which Heart is the industrial Working class of
Russia: The president of Fund «Center of Marxist researches», the
Worker, the co-ordinator of initiative group of hired workers ФГУП
«Гознак», the Chairman of Coordination council of committee of
solidarity of workers of wage labour of Moscow and the Moscow area,
Соучредитель Inter-regional public association «Fund of the organisation
of the higher labour productivity», the Member of "New economic
association» (НЭА), A.V.Chizhikov Member Krk of the Union of
workers of Moscow, member Профкома Open Society TSNIITMASH, Соучредитель
Inter-regional public association «Fund of the organisation of the
higher labour productivity» of L.I.Stoljarova The main mechanic,
the Chairman профкома Open Society «Спецремводоканал, the Chairman of
movement ОПД« Labour Kaliningrad »of/queens/, Co-chairman ОПД« Labour
Moscow suburbs », Соучредитель inter-regional public association« Fund
of the organisation of the higher labour productivity »of A.G.Klenshin
The author-developer of the International Program «Solar Hydrogen»,
Соучредитель Inter-regional public association «Fund of the organisation
of the higher labour productivity» of O.S.Zadorozhnyj
